May 2018 archive
It's hard not to have noticed that this month was when the GDPR's rubber met the road. I especially like the notices some companies have sent saying I'd better review their terms or else they'll have to stop sending me emails trying to sell me stuff.

I wondered, does the GDPR apply to a trifle of a blog based in the USA? Does it compel TOMMYJOURNAL to flesh out its terms of use and obtain explicit consent from readers? The provision for fines of up to 4% of annual worldwide turnover didn't scare me but the "or €20 million, whichever is greater" got my attention.

The GDPR reads like it was intended to make you—no matter how liberal and/or privacy-minded you are—agree with every conservative in the USA who thinks the EU is the epitome of bureaucratic hell. One cannot help but sympathize with any company that has to figure out what the GDPR even says. Anything that makes me feel sympathy for Facebook, even if only for a moment, makes me want to scream.

The GDPR implores controllers (entities responsible for how personal data is processed) to communicate with data subjects (people) "in a concise, transparent, intelligible and easily accessible form". To that end, the GDPR sets a fine example. Nothing says "concise, transparent, intelligible" better than, say, the GDPR's 97th whereas paragraph (out of 173):
Where the processing is carried out by a public authority, except for courts or independent judicial authorities when acting in their judicial capacity, where, in the private sector, processing is carried out by a controller whose core activities consist of processing operations that require regular and systematic monitoring of the data subjects on a large scale, or where the core activities of the controller or the processor consist of processing on a large scale of special categories of personal data and data relating to criminal convictions and offences, a person with expert knowledge of data protection law and practices should assist the controller or processor to monitor internal compliance with this Regulation. In the private sector, the core activities of a controller relate to its primary activities and do not relate to the processing of personal data as ancillary activities. The necessary level of expert knowledge should be determined in particular according to the data processing operations carried out and the protection required for the personal data processed by the controller or the processor. Such data protection officers, whether or not they are an employee of the controller, should be in a position to perform their duties and tasks in an independent manner.
I get that there are real problems the GDPR seeks to address. But does the remedy have to be expressed in a document that sucks the life out of you to read it?

As to whether the GDPR applies to this meager, non‑commercial, cookie‑free, based-in-the-USA blog: I don't think so.
California is having a primary election next month. This person wants to represent my district. Screenshot excerpt (red quote marks mine): sigh
runway 10/28; click for larger version Shown to the right: a portion of a runway at an airport in the USA. Note the two small oblique rectangles near the upper right corner of the pic. Can you guess what they are? They are not there for any aeronautical purpose; they are not an aid to pilots nor do they provide a signal to instruments.

I saw this on another blog recently—I'll give credit after giving time for people to guess. If you aren't guessing (i.e., if you know the answer) please hold off from posting it in a comment.

Happy nineteenth, everyone.
DWP
dog & water & power.
before; click for after Two years and a day ago, I wrote about a couple cypress trees of mine whose tops had died off. I said
Who knows, they might have quite a few years left.
They've died. I felled one of them today.

I didn't cut it off close to the ground because it's thicker there and I only have a smallish electric chainsaw. No matter. My experience is that after about twenty years the trunk will have rotted enough just below grade that you can push it over.
Yucca brevifolia A Chinese proverb of unclear origin:

栽一棵树的最佳时间是20年前,其次是现在.

Roughly: The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago. The next best time is now.

20 years ago my friend Sasha and I dug up a Joshua tree and planted it in my yard. I hadn't heard of that proverb and thus didn't know I was choosing what would, 20 years hence, be the best possible time.

The roots seemed really shallow. I planted it a little deeper than it was where I found it.

Some months later I was at a nursery looking for some other kind of tree, I don't recall which, and a guy working there told me it's a mistake to replant trees deeper because what had been exposed bark doesn't do well with dirt against it.

I asked, "Every kind of tree?"

He said, "Even the ones you've already planted."

So far the J‑tree seems to be unruffled by my faux pas.
self-explanatory
current journal
FAQ
search
contact
rss/xml
atom/xml
spam notice
terms of use
warrant canary




archive